This article is about the sociologist. For other people, see Dylan Riley (disambiguation).
Dylan John Riley
Birth name1971 (age 55–56)
DisciplineSociologist
Sub disciplineComparative historical research
WorkplacesUniversity of California, Berkeley
EducationUniversity of California, Los Angeles
Doctoral advisorRebecca Jean Emigh, Michael Mann, Perry Anderson, Carlo Ginzburg
Thesis year2002
Main interestsCivil society, fascism, cultural hegemony
InfluencesAntonio Gramsci

Dylan John Riley (born 1971) is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, and is on the editorial committee of the New Left Review (NLR).[1][2][3] He writes for the NLR[4] and Jacobin.[5]

Publications

Books

  • Doctoral dissertation, Hegemony and Domination: Civil Society and Regime Variation in Inter-War Europe, University of California, Los Angeles, 2002
  • The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania 1870-1945, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010[6]
  • How Societies and States Count: A Comparative Genealogy of Censuses with Rebecca Jean Emigh and Patricia Ahmed, Palgrave Press, 2016:
    • Volume 1: Antecedents of Censuses: From Medieval to Nation States
    • Volume 2: Changes in Censuses: From Imperialism to Welfare States
  • upcoming Rethinking Liberal Democracy and the Fascist Legacy

Selected papers

  • The Third Reich as Rogue Regime: Adam Tooze’s Wages of Destruction,[7] Historical Materialism, vol. 22, nos 3-4, 2014

References

  1. ^ "Dylan John Riley - UC Berkeley Sociology Department". Sociology.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  2. ^ "The Program in Critical Theory". Criticaltheory.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  3. ^ "Verso". Versobooks.com. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  4. ^ "New Left Review - author". Newleftreview.org. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  5. ^ "Dylan Riley". Jacobinmag.com. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  6. ^ "Verso". Versobooks.com. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
  7. ^ Riley, Dylan (2014). "The Third Reich as Rogue Regime: Adam Tooze's Wages of Destruction". Historical Materialism. 22: 330–350. doi:10.1163/1569206X-12341380. – via sociology.berkeley.edu.